"Tom Melly" <tom### [at] tomandlucouk> wrote in message
news:3aa5056f@news.povray.org...
> "Scott Hill" <sco### [at] ncgraphicsnet> wrote in message
> news:3aa5040e$1@news.povray.org...
> >
> >     Can an image, per se, be 'evil' (or 'good') ? An image that shows an
> > evil act is, surely, not in and of itself 'evil', no ?
> >
>
> I would agree - however, I suspect that it's a question of semantics. In
> this context, "evil" would seem to mean "glorifying an evil act"
>


    Ok then, does an image showing an evil act necissarily 'glorify' that
act ?

--
Scott Hill

Post a reply to this message