|
|
"Scott Hill" <sco### [at] ncgraphicsnet> wrote in message
news:3aa5040e$1@news.povray.org...
>
> Can an image, per se, be 'evil' (or 'good') ? An image that shows an
> evil act is, surely, not in and of itself 'evil', no ?
>
I would agree - however, I suspect that it's a question of semantics. In
this context, "evil" would seem to mean "glorifying an evil act"
Post a reply to this message
|
|