"Lance Birch" <-> wrote in message news:3a52bb5b@news.povray.org...
>
> OK, I looked through all the images, and I have to agree.  There are some
> really strange images that don't seem to have any kind of contrast in
them,
> for example, ones like test.jpg.  One of them looks like it's been
> completely post processed, one of them looks like it wasn't even rendered,
a
> lot of them have a lack of anti-aliasing as you mentioned, and there are
> some that don't seem to fit the theme at all.
>

The off-topic thing is weird - looking over my entries for previous irtc
entries, 3/7 of them could easily have been submitted for this round -
"contrasts" is a fairly inclusive topic as well as being a naturally
occuring theme in many compositions. As for the lack of AA, it isn't
reserved for the sub-standard images. A lot of pics that obviously required
a lot of work and effort are marred by this.

>
> Annnnyywaayyy... *goes back to looking through the images*  I think I'm
> going to have to read a lot of these text files carefully so that I
actually
> get the contrasts in some of these images.
>

Yes - although IMHO and except in specific circumstances, I don't think it
should be necessery to go to the text file to work out whether an image is
on-topic or not. Oh well.

Post a reply to this message