Gilles Tran wrote:
> 
> Just a general comment about this "search for more radiosity" samples, which
> I sincerely hope will be fruitful and lead to better, faster radiosity.
> In my experience, "more samples" doesn't mean "better radiosity". In fact,
> this is true between, say, 0 and 500, but after that, having more samples
> just doesn't address the artefact issues : ...

This is one of the reasons why i have been focussing on finding a better
solution for lower sample counts.  With higher ray counts the differences
between distributions will diminish as long as they maintain the correct
density falloff.

Christoph

-- 
POV-Ray tutorials, include files, Sim-POV,
HCR-Edit and more: http://www.tu-bs.de/~y0013390/
Last updated 31 Dec. 2002 _____./\/^>_*_<^\/\.______

Post a reply to this message