|
|
No. There was no difference operation anywhere in the code that
described that *version* of the object.
You know how the mortar between bricks or stones in a wall has a kind of
concave look to it? (i.e., it doesn't usually bleed out, like too much
peanut butter oozing out the side of a sandwich -- at least not on a
wall built by a mason who knows what s/he's doing) For the other
version of my object, I differenced the cylinders so that their central
axes ran parallel to the vertical surface of a box object. The radii of
these cylinders are greater than the distance by which they "cut" into
the wall surface. I had the cylinders running both horizontally and
vertically, the total visual effect being like the diagram I drew.
Clear?
--Mark
P.S. I considered using one big box with a modified version of the
irregular bricks pattern in textures.inc, but I'm not versed in using
macros yet...
Shay wrote:
>
> LibraryMan <mrm### [at] attnet> wrote in message
> news:3DDD43DB.42D64DB8@att.net...
>
> Did the staggered objects use difference? This would have meant more
> difference in the final wall, not less.
>
> -Shay
Post a reply to this message
|
|