|
|
Shay wrote:
> Doctor John <jgu### [at] netscapenet> wrote in message
> news:web.3dc91c75b02902dfb29393de0@news.povray.org...
>
>>BTW Forgot to add.. Your entry is brilliant. (Still trying to decide if
>
> it's
>
>>on or off topic, tho')
>>
>
>
> Thanks, I've been struggling with that for every entry in the round. Not
> whether or not the image is on topic (I believe they all are), but how to
> distinguish between an entire round of almost all very very similar topics.
>
> I am looking a lot at how specific the concepts are, whether the person had
> a strong, clear idea of how he wanted his landscape to look, or just played
> around until he got an attractive looking height-field. There are a lot of
> concepts in this round which are *very* strong in that respect.
>
>>
I think I am going to force myself to comment on a majority of the
images then go back and re-evaluate my marking, especially regarding
concept. I have never found it so difficult to figure out what to say
( think? )
Post a reply to this message
|
|