I have finished ascribing marks to the lastest round of stills, acting
for the first time in the role of "panel judge". I think there are some
very impressive entries and I am enjoying the process very much. But I
feel a little queasy when it comes to making comments. There has been
some discussion in the past which suggests the importance of comments,
but I suddenly find that I am questioning what the assumed purpose of
the comments might be. I find I try and indicate to the artist how I
respond to the image, and what higher meaning I might glean from it.
But then I grow embarrassed and opt for the obigatory superlatives. Is
there an agreed apon purpose for the comments?
-Jim ( jrc### [at] aolcom )
Post a reply to this message
|