St. wrote:

> "Tom Melly" <tom### [at] tomandlucouk> wrote in message
> news:3d78728e$1@news.povray.org...
> 
>>"St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote in message news:3d77ce80@news.povray.org...
>>
> 
>>Define "natural origin"? - or rather, "what the hell is an unnatural origin?"
>>
> 
>       Yes, I know, but the way they've presented the description, it reads to me
> that they want a scene that's *known*, i.e., "The Grand Canyon, the Himalayas, the
> Alps", etc...
> 
>     I've started a SF scene that hopefully has a "Spectacular Landscape",  but how
> do I know if it's 'natural' or not?


Exactly.
When only the title was available, I thought of a remote planet with a 
big errupting volcanoe... It has to be on a remote planet, because of 
the special lightning/feeling/... Probably not an original idea!

The way the text explains the title, I believe the landscape must be 
somewhere on Earth! Moreover, it must be a real aerial landscape (hint: 
what about Hawai islands, seen from the bottom of the sea, WiTHOUT any 
water,
just keeping the traces of where the sea would be ? That would be 
spectacular, that might be a landscape, but it does not seem to match 
the text).

Also, did anybody think about 'paper -landscape' ? It would have been an 
easy pun/word-play with the title, but it is obviously off-topic 
according to the text (unless, it's a landscape photo of a spectacular
landscape... or any thing more recursive...)... advertisement in 
landscape (instead of portrait) for a spectacle ?

Post a reply to this message