POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.general : Looking for nice ISO-Surf-Images ... : Re: Looking for nice ISO-Surf-Images ... Server Time
6 Aug 2024 04:21:06 EDT (-0400)
  Re: Looking for nice ISO-Surf-Images ...  
From: Tor Olav Kristensen
Date: 22 May 2002 20:35:51
Message: <3CEC3897.8CC79C0A@hotmail.com>
Jan Walzer wrote:
> 
> Thats very kind of you, thanx very much ..
> Here are the scenes, I'd like to use, but
> especially with the "old" Megapov ones I've some probs
> porting them to a "usable" 3.5 version ...

OK, I'll start some archaeological excavations then.
And then I'll see if I can find time for some rewriting.


> 
> > 24 Jan 2002  Almost Sphere Spirals (109 KB):
> > http://news.povray.org/povray.binaries.images/21703/
> 
> perfect ...
> 
> > 24 Jan 2002  Iso-tori (59KB):
> > http://news.povray.org/povray.binaries.images/21702/
> > http://news.povray.org/povray.text.scene-files/21784/
> 
> ... seems this source is for the latter scene ...

Sorry about that. I'll dig it out of my job PC tomorrow.


> I'd like to see the source for this one as well...
>
> > 12 Dec 2001  Iso-bonds again (42 KB):
> > http://news.povray.org/povray.binaries.images/20682/
> 
> I'd like to see the source for that scene, so I could render some
> different views ... and of course, the whole thing without
> any texturing/lighting
> > 26 Nov 2000  Iso-Cubism (66KB):
> > http://news.povray.org/povray.binaries.images/13237/
> > news://news.povray.org/3A6CE3E9.6604706A%40online.no

I think that I have v3.5 versions of the scene files
above stored on a PC that I probably will not have access
to before friday.


> > 18 Oct 2000  Inside the Crackle pattern (161KB):
> > http://news.povray.org/povray.binaries.images/13050/
> > news://news.povray.org/39EDBC5D.65D00C77%40hotmail.com

I have just posted a v3.5 version of this scene to
povray.text.scene-files:

http://news.povray.org/povray.text.scene-files/24593/


> I can't get this to work with 3.5 syntax ... I tried to adapt
> with what I thought will be the right function, but the resulting
> image is quite different ...
> 
> The semantik of the old megapov if()-function and the 3.5-select() one
> are comparable, aren't they ?

Yes, they should be comparable, but I don't remember if
the order of the arguments are the same.


Tor Olav


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.