Ha, I know that the ISO is not an isosurface,
but perhaps someone can model it with
one?

Just kidding. But I'm not sure if such nit-picking
is really useful. At least sometimes I only get
the impression that someone wants to show
off that he has some more background knowledge.

Not that I'm directing this to you personally,
I meant that just in general. In this case, I
think I can agree that writing Iso-Tutorial
instead of ISO-Tutorial is better. Its not
like Isosurface could be written as
I.S.O. (hm... Isosurface Solution Obvious? Nah...)


--
Tim Nikias
Homepage: http://www.digitaltwilight.de/no_lights/index.html

Post a reply to this message