Bernhard Wymann wrote in alt.fan.elite:
> yes, but you can raytrace today on a pc with ...-2 fps. so in
> ten years, you can do it at ...-~202 fps (2*2^(10*12/18), moore's
> law) on the cpu.  if there would be hardware support even faster.
> it's much easier to implement than todays stuff, you don't need
> light maps etc., certain effects you get automaticly right,
> without doing tricks.

You can bet your isosurface I replied to THIS...;)

-- 
Tim Cook
http://empyrean.scifi-fantasy.com

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GFA dpu- s: a?-- C++(++++) U P? L E--- W++(+++)>$
N++ o? K- w(+) O? M-(--) V? PS+(+++) PE(--) Y(--)
PGP-(--) t* 5++>+++++ X+ R* tv+ b++(+++) DI
D++(---) G(++) e*>++ h+ !r--- !y--
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

Post a reply to this message