|
 |
Bill DeWitt wrote:
> "scott tuttle" <sco### [at] hotmail com> wrote in message
> news:3be6b989@news.povray.org...
>
>>It's not like you have to pay for the upgrade you know!
>>This is what happens when people deal with microsoft too long. :)
>>
>
> No, but everytime I do an upgrade, I have to spend time getting
> everything back the way I like it. I accidentally lost my insert menu on the
> first beta re-install.
>
> Not that I am complaining, I can get by with MegaPov most of the time
> and I appreciate the work done on 3.5, but I can't pretend that frequent
> upgrades are effortless either. If the upgrades were only patches for the
> files that really needed to be changed, it would be a little nicer.
>
Exactly. Providing an "upgrade" package as well as a full install would
be very nice, indeed.
However, I understand that the POV-Team has better things to do that
search for every modified file since the last package build, and that
our having to re-modify various .ini files to our liking is probaly best
at this point.
>
>
--
/*Francois Labreque*/#local a=x+y;#local b=x+a;#local c=a+b;#macro P(F//
/* flabreque */L)polygon{5,F,F+z,L+z,L,F pigment{rgb 9}}#end union
/* @ */{P(0,a)P(a,b)P(b,c)P(2*a,2*b)P(2*b,b+c)P(b+c,<2,3>)
/* videotron.ca */}camera{location<6,1.25,-6>look_at a orthographic}
Post a reply to this message
|
|
