"Timothy R. Cook" wrote:
> 
> Same scene.  Same settings.  Radiosity, media, the whole shebang.
> 3.1 took 00:04:23:51
> 3.5 took 00:18:56:52
> 
> Shouldn't 3.5 be at least as fast, if not faster than, 3.1?
> 

3.1 radiosity should not be compared to 3.5 radiosity since both are
completely different.

Christoph

-- 
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde>
IsoWood include, radiosity tutorial, TransSkin and other 
things on: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/

Post a reply to this message