khaver wrote:
> 
> Personally, I would like POVRay to switch to a plug-in architecture.  Where
> different functionality could be attained by seperate modules.  Adding more
> and more functionality to POVRay simply bloats it.  Those that simply want a
> fast single frame raytracer wouldn't have to contend with the added memory
> overhead of a animation system built in to it.  Those that want animation
> would simply add the animation dlls to the system.

Concerning the problems of this you might want to have a look at the 'POV
4 philosophy' thread quite recently in this group.

Christoph

-- 
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde>
IsoWood include, radiosity tutorial, TransSkin and other 
things on: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/

Post a reply to this message