JRG wrote:

> To say the true the particles are really small. Look at the smallest
> particles on the ground and consider that all the particles have same
> size...
> The problem here could be that I used only 100 iterations, with 40 particles
> per iteration... just 2 minutes of parsing.

I'm intrigued. How does your system work ?
I've done some thinking but all solution I came up
with are computational monsters. Especially with
Povray, the language isn't quite as powerful as one
could wish to do real computations and animations...

Best,

    S.




>
>
> --
> Jonathan
> "Steven Pigeon" <pig### [at] iroumontrealca> ha scritto nel messaggio
> news:3BC4B40F.221A70C1@iro.umontreal.ca...
> >
> >
> > JRG wrote:
> >
> > > ...well, not really, just red paint.
> > > This is a quick test with a particles system I'm writing these days.
> This
> > > still doesn't look that good, but I'm going to post the animated version
> > > ASAP (tough you can find my previous test in p.b-a).
> > > Comments and suggestions are welcome.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jonathan.
> > >
> > >  [Image]
> >
> > hmmm...
> >
> > ....chunky....
> >
> > More small particles? ... like a LOT more ?
> >
> >
> > Best,
> >
> >     S.
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------
> > Steven Pigeon                     Ph. D. candidate
> > University of Montreal.
> > pig### [at] iroumontrealca           Topic: data compression
> > ----------------------------------------------------------
> >          http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/~pigeon
> >
> >

--
----------------------------------------------------------
Steven Pigeon                     Ph. D. candidate
University of Montreal.
pig### [at] iroumontrealca           Topic: data compression
----------------------------------------------------------
         http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/~pigeon

Post a reply to this message