Warp wrote:
> 
>   As you say, the problem is probably in the insideness test, which can
> differ slightly from what the intersection test does. Thus, we should just
> get rid of the insideness test completely. (Of course as the main purpose of
> the insideness test is speed, we will lose this seedup, but it seems that it's
> out of question.)
> 
> [...]

I'm not sure, but this could slow down things enormously, especially for
isosurfaces.

It would be nice to have another method and implement both to compare.

Christoph

-- 
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde>
IsoWood include, radiosity tutorial, TransSkin and other 
things on: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/

Post a reply to this message