Tom Melly wrote:

> Hmm, me too (which would seem to point to a minor design problem on the page). I
> was so convinced I'd d/l'd the right file, I went ahead and installed it,
> convinced that all the messages and warnings were because the 3.5 install had
> been patched onto the install for 3.1.

I did the exact same thing. The download page is confusing at best, and I came to
the same conclusion, that the 3.1 installer was somehow being used for the 3.5 beta.
It might help if there is something that directs the user to the bottom of the page,
where the correct link is.

Post a reply to this message