Simon de Vet wrote:
> 
> Jaime Vives Piqueres <jai### [at] ignoranciaorg> wrote in
> news:3B94891E.A81AFD2B@ignorancia.org:
> 
> >   No, all these are very good! And they fit perfectly with "anything
> > involving a battle": do people come to underground shelters for
> > pleasure? No, it is because there is a battle outside. So it "involves
> > a battle", but out of the scene. That's perfectly on topic! And it's
> > brilliant, because it shows the war trough it's social impact, rather
> > than directly showing the war itself, which can be somewhat
> > "impersonal".
> 
> That's what I was hoping. I just dread seeing a hundred "Tank shoots Tank,
> Plane shoots Ship" images. The interesting part of warfare is not the
> hardware.

Don't worry.  I'm sure people will still find ways of having their image
revolve around a scantily clad poser model...

-- 
Francois Labreque | Unfortunately, there's no such thing as a snooze
    flabreque     | button on a cat who wants breakfast.
        @         |      - Unattributed quote from rec.humor.funny
   videotron.ca

Post a reply to this message