|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Warp wrote:
>
> Cris Williams <wor### [at] netscape net> wrote:
> : It looks to me like you loose some detail when the bump_map method is used.
> : The HF image seems more realistic. The grain seems to be deeper and more 3D
> : in the HF. The differences are subtle, though.
>
> Are you aware of what exactly does a bump_map do? Your text sounds a bit
> like you may not be completely sure. I (or someone else) can explain it if
> you want (it's rather interesting).
>
Apart from the obvious differences, it's also important to adapt normal
accuracy or heightfield resolution so results are comparable.
Christoph
--
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmx de>
IsoWood include, radiosity tutorial, TransSkin and other
things on: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |