Well, in my case when I entered the IRTC there was just
TOO much code to show.  So far all the stuff I've used
generates script files but often I generate megabytes
worth of script in order to render my animations.
Nothing less interesting than looking at script
defining control points of Bezier patches... :o)

Even with my latest efforts using Hash AM I generate
script files, but they aren't the port through which I
modify things anymore, as they still are when I use
Polyray.

I guess I've always just contacted th author of an
image/anim when I want to know something, as they all
tend to be online and accessible.

-peter

ingo wrote:
> 
> in news:3B420E5F.519BBF8F@qwest.net Dearmad wrote:
> 
> > I'm interested in composition combined with interp
> > combined with technical tricks/shortcuts/efforts that
> > show originality.
> >
> 
> Source File:
> (none given)
> 
> I like to have a peek at the if there is something in an image that
> interests me. Not to copy the tricks, just to see how people aproched a
> problem. To me this is one of the most attractive aspects of the IRTC.
> With the use of modelers etc. there isn't much code to see anymore.
> 
> Ingo
> 
> --
> Photography: http://members.home.nl/ingoogni/
> Pov-Ray    : http://members.home.nl/seed7/

-- 
http://www.users.qwest.net/~dearmad
Why bother?  I'm not interesting.
But... maybe "Ballet pour ma fille" will be.

Post a reply to this message