|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
yep, I thank yee
Warp wrote:
> Wouldn't it be handier this way?
>
> #macro fillpoints ( c0, c1, c2, c3 )
> c0,
> c0+((c1 - c0)*1/3),
> c0+((c1 - c0)*2/3),
> c1,
> c0+((c2 - c0)*1/3),
> c0+((c3 - c0)*1/3),
> c2+((c1 - c2)*1/3),
> c1+((c3 - c1)*1/3),
> c0+((c2 - c0)*2/3),
> c2+((c1 - c2)*2/3),
> c0+((c3 - c0)*2/3),
> c1+((c3 - c1)*2/3),
> c2,
> c2+((c3 - c2)*1/3),
> c2+((c3 - c2)*2/3),
> c3
> #end
>
> bicubic_patch
> { type 1 flatness 0.5 u_steps 3 v_steps 3
> fillpoints(p1, p2, p3, p4)
> }
>
> --
> #macro N(D,I)#if(I<6)cylinder{M()#local D[I]=div(D[I],104);M().5,2pigment{
> rgb M()}}N(D,(D[I]>99?I:I+1))#end#end#macro M()<mod(D[I],13)-6,mod(div(D[I
> ],13),8)-3,10>#end blob{N(array[6]{11117333955,
> 7382340,3358,3900569407,970,4254934330},0)}// - Warp -
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |