|
|
Tom Melly wrote:
>
> Is it me, or does the overall quality seem a bit, well, low on the current
> round?
That's difficult to compare. I think there's no more "bad" or "weak"
images than usual (well, about 50-60 %), but there's no "clear winners"
this time, maybe.
Fabien.
Post a reply to this message
|
|