Ben Chambers wrote:
> 
> Just a small note, is anyone else here annoyed
> by images that don't fit on the screen?  I'm running
> at 1024x768, which I had considered plenty, except
> that many entries in the IRTC still don't fit.  Thoughts,
> anyone?
> 
> ...Chambers
> PS.  Not that the images are bad, but the fact that I
> have to scroll to see the whole thing detracts from
> the quality of the image.

I'm using IrfanView to view them and therefore can either scroll or view
it resized.  In either case, the impression is not optimal and i can only
vote according to my impression :-)

On the other hand some very nice pictures are quite small in this round so
they don't look optimal either.  

Maybe a size limit is not such a bad idea after all, because it would lead
to a more constant size and therefore easier comparison.  Anyway i think
1024x768 would be better for the limit, because smaller screen resolutions
are already quite seldom.

Christoph

-- 
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde>
IsoWood include, radiosity tutorial, TransSkin and other 
things on: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/

Post a reply to this message