Nathan Kopp wrote:

>  I, for one, would rather have had Gilles clothe
> the subjects in his art (at least with a bathrobe or towel or something).

In a strict biblical sense, images of a woman in a bathrobe might engender just
as much sinful lust (Job 31, Matt 5 ) in piquing the imagination as a nude
figure.  As I said before, even Condoleeza Rice's professional attire inspired
mind-numbing lust in Ariel Sharon.  If one is looking to the outside world to
protect oneself from sinful thoughts, you're in trouble.

Post a reply to this message