I appreciate your concern for wanting the IRTC to have a standard of decency,
but most of us agree that it does have some standards. In the past there have
been entries containing nudity and even of one couple in bed, but usually
nudity on the IRTC is in purely artistic form, especially Gilles work. The work
on his site quite excellent, and once he did post a warning about full frontal
nudity in one of his adam and eve scenarios, and it was agreed by most everyone
that the warning was polite, but there was no pornographic content in the
image.

Josh

David wrote:

> I sent this to the IRTC people, now I "carbon copy" it to you:
>
>   Greetings,
>
>   I am very disturbed about the November-December 2000 stills winner. Quite
> frankly, I don't want to see pictures of naked women (or men, for that
> matter)! This picture should have been disqualified for inappropriate
> content. What right has anyone to post content which is almost universally
> considered evil on an innocent raytracing site!? This is not acceptable! I
> hope that the judges will have more sense and decency in the future.
> ______
> David McCabe
> dav### [at] maccom
> http://homepage.mac.com/davidmccabe/
> God is good!

--
Josh English -- Lexiphanic Lethomaniac
eng### [at] spiritonecom
The POV-Ray Cyclopedia http://www.spiritone.com/~english/cyclopedia/
"He who hebetates is last."

Post a reply to this message