> What right has anyone to post content which is almost universally
> considered evil on an innocent raytracing site!?

  I guess it was almost universally considered good art, because the
winner of the contest is selected by majority rule. Also, the character
isn't exactly engaging in any obscene behavior. Previous rounds have a
witch and a severed head--nothing "evil" about that though huh?
And let's not forget November-December 1999 which also contains naked
folks. Or March-April 1998 which contains a girl wearing a nighty in
bed. Were these past winners just not "evil" enough?


-- 
Phil
...coffee?...yes please! extra sugar,extra cream...Thank you.

Post a reply to this message