Tom Melly wrote:
> 
> I came across this one the other day (don't know how I'd missed this
> "feature" before).
> 
> Basically, I expected the two following rotations to be identical:
> 
> rotate y * - 45 + 45

Which the parser expands to y*-45 + <45,45,45> = <45,0,45>

> rotate y * (- 45 + 45)

Which the parser evaluates as y*0.

> Confused of Putney.

Hope this enlightens,
John

Post a reply to this message