|
 |
> IMO thumbnails under 10k, I keep the ones on my site around 3-4k but they're small
in
> area compared to some and there's a lot of them. Backgrounds small too, "title"
> graphics under 50k and images themselves under 200. Of course you always have to
> consider jpeg limitations, so exceptions can be made.
>
> It looks like your site is pretty good about that. I see you have two res. for each
> one, that's always nice.
This makes me think that I could probably compress most the small images,
thumbnails, etc to 90-95% and still get a very nice image but with half the disk
size... The difference won't even be noticable!...
--
+-------------------------+----------------------------------+
| Simon Lemieux | http://www.666Mhz.net |
| Email : Sin### [at] 666Mhz net | Povray and OpenGL Gallery |
+-------------------------+----------------------------------+
Post a reply to this message
|
|
