Ken wrote:

> Warp wrote:
> >
> > Ken <tyl### [at] pacbellnet> wrote:
> > : Why go looking though a bunch of macro files
> > : for a specific function when if can be hard wired into the program.
> >
> >   Let me think about some reasons why a macro would be better:
>
> And this is the exact response I expected from someone with advanced
> mathematical and programming skills. You just don't get it.

I don't understand. If someone else has already programmed the pattern for
you, what's the difference if it's a macro or hard-coded? From the user's
perspective I would think it wouldn't matter, from the programmer's the
macro solution is far better. It's not like you code fonts into a word
processor.

--
David Fontaine  <dav### [at] faricynet>  ICQ 55354965
My raytracing gallery:  http://davidf.faricy.net/

Post a reply to this message