Warp wrote:
> So there's no way you can automatically get the optimal extents of an object.
> The only solution is just to fine-tune by hand (eg. using a semi-transparent
> box in the place of your bounding box to see what does it cover).
You could also 'scan' the object with the 'trace' function, in order
to get a closer result.
Fabien.
Post a reply to this message
|