Alan Kong wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 03 Jan 2001 09:59:48 +0000 John VanSickle wrote:
> 
> >Will p.o-t be back?
> 
>   Hi, John. Ken's post from 02-Jan-2001, message-ID:
> <3A52B9EC.577C3B2E@pacbell.net> pretty much sums it up.
> 
>   Also, I saw your other post in this group concerning an
> 'interpretation' of Australian law posted by an individual - hopefully
> you were just kidding and not actually accepting that the law was as
> that person distorted it.

I was heaping scorn upon Matt's ideas about Australian law.

Regards,
John

Post a reply to this message