Matt Giwer wrote:
> 
> Chris Cason wrote:
> >
> > > I posted publically that email would be public.
> >
> > I did not see the post you refer to prior to sending you the email
> > in question. As I mentioned I do not read p.o.t except when I have
> > to, and it certainly was not there at the time.
> >
> > In any case, that is still not an excuse for posting my email to the
> > server as I had not agreed that you could do so.
> 
>         Your problem, not mine.
> 
>         It is good to be the owner.

	You did not prohibit it nor make any disclaimers to the contrary. 

	Unlike you, I have no fear of my posts being public and I know they are
owned by the recipient even under totalitarian Australian law. 

	As this is likely my last post to any povray newsgroup because of your
tender sensibilities I note you are unable to deal with your posts being
made public and as it is good to be the owner, F-U 2. 

	We really have no serious issue here. 

	But you are insisting upon making an issue. 

-- 
Curmudgeons R Us. 
	-- The Iron Webmaster, 310

Post a reply to this message