Pete wrote:
>
> Tor wrote:
>
> >I have enclosed a 1027x768 version.
> >(This time with "wrinkles")
>
> Thanks! It's even cooler big. Such detail!
I'm happy that someone likes this.
> Iso-surfaces are cool.
>...
Yes I agree.
Some people in these newsgroups have tried to
convince me to use MegaPov since April (I think).
Two months ago the temptation had grown so great
that I installed it.
And one month ago I "discovered" iso-surfaces.
Now I (almost) admit that I regret that I did
not install MegaPov earlier. ;)
>...
> (how long do these isosurface things take to render, BTW?)
I don't remember the stats, but I see now that
the large one with the wrinkles renders at about
18 pixels per second (at my 100MHz Pentium).
1024 x 768 / 3600 = 218.5 218.5/18 = 12.1
(So by this calculation it takes about 12 hours
to render.)
Regards,
Tor Olav
--
mailto:tor### [at] hotmail com
http://www.crosswinds.net/~tok/tokrays.html
Post a reply to this message
|
