Yes I am aware of that but I found that it was quite hard to control. Much
easier if there was one finish for the whole texture.

Mick

"Thorsten Froehlich" <tho### [at] trfde> wrote in message
news:39da7513$1@news.povray.org...
> In article <39da341d@news.povray.org> , "Mick Hazelgrove"
> <mic### [at] mhazelgrovefsnetcouk> wrote:
>
> > I like this new structure very much. I've only just come across the need
for
> > a "finish map" (No, not a map of Finland!)
> > this would solve the problem nicely and is much more logical.
>
> You are aware that you can just use a texture_map, so except for
consistency
> reasons the current syntax should not limit you, or does it?
>
>
>        Thorsten

Post a reply to this message