In article <39da341d@news.povray.org> , "Mick Hazelgrove" 
<mic### [at] mhazelgrovefsnetcouk> wrote:

> I like this new structure very much. I've only just come across the need for
> a "finish map" (No, not a map of Finland!)
> this would solve the problem nicely and is much more logical.

You are aware that you can just use a texture_map, so except for consistency
reasons the current syntax should not limit you, or does it?


       Thorsten

Post a reply to this message