|
|
Josh English <eng### [at] spiritonecom> wrote:
: Actually you should use < and > because not all the browsers understand
: the names, but they all understand the code.
Aren't < and > part of the HTML standard? Why should we restrict
ourselves to some browsers which do not support the standard?
As long as we make strictly standardized HTML, there's no problem. If a
browser doesn't support the standard, it's the headache of the browser,
not the maker of the page.
And does the HTML standard say that < means '<' (the browser might
not be using the unicode charset)?
--
main(i,_){for(_?--i,main(i+2,"FhhQHFIJD|FQTITFN]zRFHhhTBFHhhTBFysdB"[i]
):_;i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_=0,"\n")),_/=2);} /*- Warp -*/
Post a reply to this message
|
|