"J. Grimbert" wrote:

> > The height is multiplied by 1/(1-rad2/rad1)? Strange.
> >
>
> No, normal : the bounding code was made before it was
> possible to have a cone truncated, so it always included
> the sharp extremety of the cone.

Oh, that makes sense. I wasn't thinking that POV internally extended the cone.

--
David Fontaine  <dav### [at] faricynet>  ICQ 55354965
My raytracing gallery:  http://davidf.faricy.net/

Post a reply to this message