|
 |
"J. Grimbert" wrote:
> If you are using any truncated cone (like cone{<0,0,0>1,<0,1,0>,0.5} )
> be aware that there is a bug on the bounding box size (too big)
> (for the previous cone, the box has a height of 2, not 1, and if
> instead of 0.5 it is 0.95, the height is about 20 !!)
>
> This bug is present in the official 3.1g
> (and has been reported in p.b, so no more action needed until 3.5 !)
The height is multiplied by 1/(1-rad2/rad1)? Strange.
--
David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricy net> ICQ 55354965
My raytracing gallery: http://davidf.faricy.net/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
