Warp wrote:
> 
>   I think that internal motion blur is always faster unless all the scene
> is moving. This is because only part of the image has to be extra-calculated
> instead of the whole image (as happens when using the external method).
>   If all the scene is moving, then both methods may be as slow.
> 

However, internal motion blur (as implemented in MegaPOV) uses more memory -
often significantly more.
And if the whole scene is moving, I'm pretty sure the frame averaging method is
somewhat faster, since there is no additional overhead of checking the
time-stamps.

-- 
Margus Ramst

Personal e-mail: mar### [at] peakeduee
TAG (Team Assistance Group) e-mail: mar### [at] tagpovrayorg

Post a reply to this message