|
 |
1) Yes, perhaps the best answer is a style sheet.
2) Yes, thanks for the reminder that frames are no-no for some users. The
navigation would be added at the end.
3) width, height: What is the consequence of leaving this out? I didn't
mean to forbid it, but what is the NEED?
4) <blockquote> is just my preference for having the page have a margin
and more readable. No harm to anyone, I believe, if you are missing a
</blockquote>
5) <p>Don't take this too literally as to where and when to post these.
6) Yes, alt tags are cool. I didn't mean to forbid them.
7) <head> </head> Yeah, this is good practice.
8) <h1> Well, this is often so big as to be distracting, and I was thinking
of using <h2> somewhere else or for navigation, etc.
Do I actually know _how_ to do a style sheet? Never read that chapter of
html for dummies.
I _do_ want:
a) an extremely rigid and consistent way of linking to your images and
embedded files (there could be tons of files uploaded).
b) generally a consistent look.
c) some keywords so that we can set up easier way for users to access tuts
(instead of inferring content from title).
d) an email address in there so I can keep the files and your "identity"
straight.
Mike Williams wrote:
> Wasn't it Greg M. Johnson who wrote:
> >I'm proposing the following required format for the 10Best Cd
> >collection.
> >It can be of any length with any number of include files or what have
> >you . But it should be one html zipped together with text files and
> >JPG's per "submission."
> >Each file should follow the following format for use of included html
> >code, included longer files, headings, and for reference to JPG's. I'll
> >make up a web page to explain this in greater detail. But any
> >objections to this so far?
>
> It looks severely bland. How about providing a pretty cascading style
> sheet, and we'll all link to it by putting a link to it, like
> <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="pretty.css"></head>
> and perhaps having a background image or background colour that we'd all
> use.
>
> I notice that there's no navigation specified here. Are you planning on
> having all the navigation in a separate frame (and remembering that
> POVRay runs on some machines that don't have frame-capable browsers) or
> are you expecting the users to make extensive use of the BACK button?
>
> --
> Mike Williams
> Gentleman of Leisure
Post a reply to this message
|
|
