> Quite right about the motion blur, but when combining flash with long exposure
> times in photography, you can achieve an effect similar to the one you
> criticise.  Of course that's a rare occasion, and would require the main light
> source being near the camera, but i wanted to mention it.

	I don't agree that the light source *must* be close to the camera.
Simply this is the most common situation when the internal or added flash
of the camera is used to do this effect.


*** Nicolas Calimet
*** http://pov4grasp.free.fr

Post a reply to this message