Nathan Kopp wrote:
> 
> "Fabien Mosen" <fab### [at] skynetbe> wrote...
> >
> > So, let's post-process all the way !  It doesn't matter anymore !
> 
> That may not be the best idea, since it would allow more junk images in (a
> little bit of rendering, but most of the stuff done in Photoshop).  A
> re-wording of the rule to capture more of the original intent would be
> better, IMHO.

Sure.  Could be something like "post-processing is admitted, as long
as it couldn't have been done in a strictly 2D paint program".. or
".. as long as 3D information is used in the process".. or "as long
as it is an automated process".. or maybe all that together !

Regarding my last entry (fmsea.jpg), I'm very happy that the
post_process focal blur exists !  Thanks programmers !!

Fabien.

Post a reply to this message