Yes, true.
Also, for example in PACMAN.POV I added an extra power pill, because the
viewing area is a bit different and on a 3:2 aspect ratio, one more
power pill can be seen, part of it anyway.

Christoph Hormann wrote:
> 
> Filiep Geeraert wrote:
> >
> [...]
> >
> > What I was wondering if there are other people that would be interested
> > in those JPG files, and what the creators of those files would think if
> > I made a website with some of there works of art :
> >
> > - at 3000x2000x16.7 million colours, with a 3:2 aspect ratio.
> > - I would of course put the name of the person that created it next to
> > it.
> >
> 
> There is already a site with some larger version of IRTC images:
> 
> http://sh55k01.jvb.tudelft.nl/irtc/
> 
> Not the size you want, but it's somewhere on the way.
> 
> > Would they object to this ?
> > I mean : on the one hand they're not my works of art, and they might
> > object to the fact I am changing the aspect ratio.
> > On the other I would respect their copyright by not pretending I created
> > them, and by placing the names of the authors next to them.
> > After all, anyone could rerender them and change them accordingly, as
> > you can get the files from the IRTC archives.
> 
> You surely have to get permission from every single artist.
> 
> You should also remember, that the aspect ratio somehow is part of the work, so
> you would also change the scene in some way.
> 
> Christoph
> 
> --
> Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde>
> Homepage: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/

Post a reply to this message