Nathan Kopp <Nat### [at] koppcom> wrote:
: I also noticed the similarity right away.  However, although I feel that
: this was a very poor choice on the part of the artist, I don't think that it
: breaks the rules.  The artist seems to indicate that the image was re-done
: completely from scratch.  Only a review of the source code for the two
: images could confirm or deny that.  If much of the image components are
: re-used, than this would definatly be bad.  But, if the image is a
: completely new image, then I don't see a problem, other than the fact that
: we've seen it before so now the "concept" is less interesting.

  Compare the two images side by side. If you ignore texturing and lighting
they are almost identical. I can't believe the new one is made completely
from the scratch.

-- 
main(i,_){for(_?--i,main(i+2,"FhhQHFIJD|FQTITFN]zRFHhhTBFHhhTBFysdB"[i]
):5;i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_=0,"\n")),_/=2);} /*- Warp -*/

Post a reply to this message