I suppose I can see that - just as long as they are useful and are put nicely
into the directory tree. The only reason I am a bit skeptical is that I don't
use the current include files within the Pov-Ray distribution (except perhaps
for examples). Thoguh they are only color definitions. I still maintain that a
central place for links to macros and includes would be useful on the Pov-Ray
site.

Happy Tracing

Tim Soderstrom
TigerHawk


>   In my opinion it's better that they are in the same packet specially if
> they are documented in the povray documentation.
>   It doesn't cost anything and you don't have to bother downloading several
> files.
>   Besides, many example scenes can probably use the macros. If they aren't
> there, it's a bad thing.
>
> --
> main(i,_){for(_?--i,main(i+2,"FhhQHFIJD|FQTITFN]zRFHhhTBFHhhTBFysdB"[i]
> ):5;i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_=0,"\n")),_/=2);} /*- Warp -*/

Post a reply to this message