Peter Popov wrote:
> 
> >Any ideas?  More blobs?  Bigger radii?  Stronger values?
> 
> Less blobs, larger radius, smaller strength, greater threshold. That's
> how I solved the problem when it arose yesterday during the creation
> of the twisted torus thingy. Basically, the lower the threshold and
> the greater the strength, the less likely are the components to 'blob'
> together and the more liable they are to jagging. Vice versa, when
> they are of smaller strength (therefore requiring a larger radius to
> compensate for that) and the threshold is higher, more components'
> contributions are needed to overcome the threshold, causing them to
> blob together.

Makes sense.  I'll give it a try.

> 
> I hope I made this clear enough, it's a little past 7 am and I am not
> used to getting up so early so please forgive any oddities.

That's alright.  I, too, was up at the crack of dawn (so to speak!). 
Jacques Villeneuve finally has a racecar!  Yay!


> 
> Peter Popov ICQ : 15002700
> Personal e-mail : pet### [at] usanet
> TAG      e-mail : pet### [at] tagpovrayorg

-- 
Francois Labreque |   //\\    Wear an ASCII ribbon!
     flabreq      |  ||  ||   
        @         |   \\//    Support the campain
  attglobal.net        \\     against HTML e-mail!
                      //\\

Post a reply to this message