|
 |
Well, I never used Radiosity much because it gave me weird results (probably
because I don't know how to use it), but idea seems sound :) I do hope they
include texutre alignment in 3.5 - It's farily easy to do by hand or with Moray,
but there's always that human error involved. But I don't complain too much,
since it is free and is already very powerful - I just like putting my 2 cents
in every now and then :)
Tim Soderstrom
TigerHawk
Warp wrote:
> TigerHawk <tig### [at] stic net> wrote:
> : I wonder if they will finally make Radiosity a non-experimental feature?
>
> I don't know if it will still be experimental in 3.5 (or forever), but I
> think that here will always be room for making it better. Although megapov's
> radiosity is improved, it still has some problems to be solved.
>
> --
> main(i,_){for(_?--i,main(i+2,"FhhQHFIJD|FQTITFN]zRFHhhTBFHhhTBFysdB"[i]
> ):5;i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_=0,"\n")),_/=2);} /*- Warp -*/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
