>People aren't that Victorian, surely?...


Yup. Imagine your eight year old son surfing along, while their parents look
behind their back. Kids don't mind, that's for sure, but parents really can
be picky. People are different, like it or not. (Me myself have no problem
with it, except that it makes the look of the site silly.)

>..... but in which case I doubt
>they'd be too interested in POV development in any case.  Come on, be
>realistic!


Why wouldn't anyone be interested in Povray? Is there some rule to tell who
likes Povray?

>Why isn't it good enough?  Do we want to say "if you want to make any type
>of image with POV, you've got to read the manual from cover to cover and
>learn plenty of POV script"?

I don't really think that _any_ image not entirely created within Povray
should be banned to promote it. I thought so at first, but you have a point
here. But then again, this image doesn't show off any particulary
interesting fact about Povray; rather more about the modeller used here.
(Poser?) I think one would be better off showing off some _features_.

>Doesn't the suggestion of adding a fatter model to povray.org to discourage
>teenage dieting sound just a little silly to you?  I very much doubt
whether
>a single teenage girl would intentionally visit the site anyway.


I ditn't! I just said it was ugly! Please don't put several words at the
same time in my mouth. It ain't that big!

Simen Kvaal.

Post a reply to this message