"Warp" <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote in message
news:394291e5@news.povray.org...
> Scott Hill <sco### [at] innocentcom> wrote:
> :     1. Multiple objects.
>
>   The result will be wrong. Suppose that the object stays in its place.
> With true motion blur it will not have any difference from a non-blurred
> object. With this multiple object trick it will be a bit transparent.
>

    Well, I'd personally modify the number of clone objects according to the
distance an object moves - if it doesn't move it needs no clones. Besides,
surely because all the semi-transparent clones are just going to be exactly
over the non-transparent original this one will show through, making it
completely non-transparent.

--
Scott Hill. (sco### [at] innocentcom)
Software Engineer.
Author of Pandora's Box (coming to a web page soon(ish)).

*Everything in this post is IMO.*

Post a reply to this message