Chris Huff wrote:

>
> The changes are probably too tightly integrated to separate from
> everything else without a large amount of work.
>

I had a feeling... Maybe later ...?

>
> What exactly don't you like about the new one?
> It is faster, smoother, less buggy, and does a much better simulation of
> light. Perhaps you are just using the wrong settings, the ones that were
> good for the official version don't work as well in the new radiosity.
>

See my "Rad not Rad" post to see what i want to achieve... I tried changing
settings to match w/ little success... Both images use the default settings...

>
> --
> Christopher James Huff - Personal e-mail: chr### [at] yahoocom
> TAG(Technical Assistance Group) e-mail: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg
> Personal Web page: http://chrishuff.dhs.org/
> TAG Web page: http://tag.povray.org/

Post a reply to this message